Legal Opinion

United States v. Lowrey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1949No. 9727PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In the Court below, the appellant was convicted of violating the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 408 [now §§ 2311-2313], and his motion for a new trial was denied. We think the decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the Opinion of the District Judge. 1948, 77 F.Supp. 301.

The appellant suggests that he has “after discovered evidence.” Since this point does not appear to have been asserted on the motion for new trial, we do not here undertake to consider it, but the appellant should be free to address a motion to the District Court on that ground pursuant to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LowreyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LowreyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. United States v. Herman KravitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. James Edgar LowreyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. BuckelewDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API