LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge:

After an approximately three-week trial, a jury returned a verdict largely in favor of Defendant Whirlpool Corporation (‘Whirlpool”) and against Plaintiff LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., (“LG”). Specifically, the jury found in favor of Whirlpool and against LG on LG’s claim of false advertising under the Lanham Act. The jury also found in favor of Whirlpool and against LG on LG’s claim under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“the CFA”). The jury did find in favor of LG and against Whirlpool on LG’s claim…