Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 2002No. 1001578, 1001630 and 1001631PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

831 So.2d 21 (2002)

Sue RYAN and Willard Ryan

v.

Jim HAYES et al.

Karl Franklin Smith, individually and as next friend of William Frank Smith III, a minor

v.

Jim Hayes et al.

Michael Peden and Harold Peden

v.

Jim Hayes et al.

1001578, 1001630 and 1001631.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 22, 2002.

Randall S. Haynes and Larry W. Morris of Morris, Haynes & Hornsby, Alexander City, for appellants Sue Ryan and Willard Ryan.

Nat Bryan and Thomas M. Powell of Marsh, Rickard & Bryan, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants Karl Franklin Smith, Michael Peden, and Harold Peden.

Winston V. Legge, Jr., of Patton, Latham,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. James Hill v. Madison County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Giambrone v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Howard v. City of AtmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API