Legal Opinion

Shoe Form Co. v. Irwin Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 22, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

The complaint alleges infringement by the defendant of plaintiff’s design patent and seeks an injunction and a judgment for damages and profits.

The case was tried to the court. The patent in issue is Des. 106968 “Design for a Box or similar article”. The single claim reads, “I claim: The ornamental design for a box or similar article substantially as shown.”

Fig. 2 is a section on the line 2&emdash;2 of Fig. 1.

The filewrapper shows a filing date of March 20, 1937. The first Patent Office action was taken on April 10, 1937. It re- jected the claim on the ground of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Ashley v. Weeks-Numan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  5. Neufeld-Furst & Co. v. Jay-Day Frocks Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knickerbocker Plastic Co. v. Allied Molding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API