Legal Opinion

Tyrese Williams v. Heather J. Steggall

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 25, 2025No. 2:23-cv-10557Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRESE WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:23-cv-10557-MEMF (BFM) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 L. MARTINEZ, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petitions, the records 19 on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 21 the Report to which objections have been made. 22 The Report recommends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Runningeagle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Willis Creech v. Scott FrauenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Eduardo Amezcue v. J. Tim OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API