Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Carreras

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 6, 2000No. 13-98-517-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice DORSEY.

This case concerns the scope of a physician’s duty when examining one who is not a patient. We hold that when a physician examines a person for the benefit of a third party and no physician-patient relationship exists, the only duty owed by the physician is the duty not to injure the examinee. Expert testimony is not required in order to raise a fact question on whether that duty is breached.

Simon Ramirez filed a worker’s compensation claim, and the worker’s compensation insurance carrier hired Dr. Carreras to perform an impairment rating on him. Ramirez…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Jackson v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Bird v. W.C.W.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dyer v. TrachtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dubose v. Worker's Medical, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Tesoro v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Lection v. Dyll, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  5. Villarreal v. Art Institute of Houston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API