Legal Opinion

O'Sullivan v. Feinberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order granting a review of the determination of the Public Service Commission of the State of New York (hereinafter called the commission) and for a final order determining that respondent, New York and Richmond Gas Company (hereinafter called the gas company), be required to pay the cost and expense of converting petitioner’s equipment and appliances so that the same will perform satisfactorily with the use of natural gas the operations theretofore successfully completed with the use of manufactured gas.

No question as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. People Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Everbest Engineering Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Brothers Drive-In, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API