Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Younger v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. 15701PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court December 30, 1919, for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue certain salary warrants to the state labor commissioner.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an original application in this court for a writ of mandamus. The relator is the state labor commissioner and the respondent the state auditor. The relator claims the right to have issued to him certain salary warrants by virtue of chapter 130, p. 309, of the Laws of 1919. The relator’s term as *242commissioner of labor of the state of Washington began on April 3, 1917, and under the statute, Rem. Code, § 6550, his term of office was for a period of four years. The salary of the office, at the time of his appointment, was $2,400 per annum. It thus appears that, at the time the act of 1919…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Creek County v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Harvey v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. WardallWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. People, Ex Rel. Johnson v. CoffeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Short v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Thompson v. HofstatterNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. State Consolidated Publishing Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API