Legal Opinion

Simon v. Merritt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 24, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Lee Dist/riet Cowri. Action by the holder of a promissory note against the maker. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Ch. J.

The defendant filed an equitable answer setting np fraud practiced by tbe payee of tbe note upon defendant in order to procure its execution, and alleging a conspiracy on tbe part of tbe transferee of tbe note, tbe payee and others to cheat and defraud citizens generally, and that defendant, by tbe fraud practiced upon him, was induced to sign tbe note. Tbe answer avers that plaintiff bad notice of tbe fraud in procuring tbe note, and that it was given without consideration. It is also alleged that plaintiff’s transferrer bad notice of tbe fraud. Tbe answer is in tbe nature of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  2. Hascall v. WhitmoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koehler v. DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Commercial Savings Bank v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. City Nat. Bank v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Mornyer v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API