Legal Opinion

Commercial Savings Bank v. Colthurst

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De Grape, J.-

-This appeal concerns itself with the Iona fides of the plaintiff bank in the negotiation and purchase of the -note in suit. The trial court ruled that the bank was a holder in due course, and at the close of all the testimony directed a verdict in its favor. Did _ , „ the court err?

The note reads as follows:

$4,000 December 9, 1918 On or before one year after date I promise to pay to the order of myself at...........,,........four thousand dollars for value received, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum, from date. I. L. Colthurst.

80c. I. R. Stamps attached and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Anthony v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. First National Bank of Montour v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. First National Bank v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Second National Bank v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API