Commercial Savings Bank v. Colthurst
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
De Grape, J.-
-This appeal concerns itself with the Iona fides of the plaintiff bank in the negotiation and purchase of the -note in suit. The trial court ruled that the bank was a holder in due course, and at the close of all the testimony directed a verdict in its favor. Did _ , „ the court err?
The note reads as follows:
$4,000 December 9, 1918 On or before one year after date I promise to pay to the order of myself at...........,,........four thousand dollars for value received, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum, from date. I. L. Colthurst.
80c. I. R. Stamps attached and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Anthony v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Bank of Montour v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- First National Bank v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Second National Bank v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.