Legal Opinion
In re Jacelyn TT.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
*1060In order to establish permanent neglect, petitioner was required to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, although able to do so, respondent failed to plan for the future of the child for a period of one year after the child came into petitioner’s custody despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to strengthen the parent-child relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 142 [1984]; Matter of Tailer Q. [Melody Q.], 86 AD3d 673, 674 [2011]). Respondent’s contention that he was not offered any services or provided with any guidance as to how…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Guardianship of Star Leslie W.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Tailer Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Nicole K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Natasha F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Tyler LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Chorus SS.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Summer SS.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re Neal TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Neal TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012