Legal Opinion
In re Natasha F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Fines, J), entered April 22, 2003, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent George H.’s child.
Respondent George H. (hereinafter respondent), who is incarcerated in a state correctional facility, is the father of Natasha F. In 2002, Natasha and her two half-siblings were adjudicated neglected pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10 and were placed in foster care. In January 2003, petitioner made an application to, among other things,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CruwysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re Jerry XX.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re William X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Senator NN.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Kila DD.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Randi NN.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Vivian OO.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Andrew L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.