Legal Opinion
Efford v. Milam
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 7, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-6018PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
YOHN, District Judge.
Currently pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, Pennsylvania on the ground that defendants, in filing their notice of removal with this court, failed to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) and (b). Plaintiffs contend that defendants failed to include with the notice of removal all of the materials required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), and that defendants’ notice was untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion will bp granted.
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Bosky v. Kroger Texas, LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Costa v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Minissale v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Rosenfield v. Forest City Enters., L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Boggs v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- JHohman, LLC v. United States Security Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.