Legal Opinion

Castruccio v. Estate of Castruccio

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 2017No. 79/16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.

If from the whole evidence, the jury shall find that Tilgh-man Waters executed the will in controversy, in the presence of three subscribing witnesses thereto, and that they, at his request, in his presence, and in the presence of each other, signed their names as witnesses thereto; that at the time of the execution thereof, he, the said Tilghman, was capable of understanding the business in which he was engaged—the property he desired to dispose of, and the object of his bounty named in said will, and that the same was his free and voluntary act, they will find for the defendants.

Waters v.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Boland v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Blackburn Ltd. Partnership v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spevak v. Montgomery Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Estate of Castruccio v. CastruccioCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Estate of SteinerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Spevak v. Montgomery Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. State v. FabienCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API