Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Hanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1966No. 8269-8271PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

The three actions above-entitled were consolidated for trial. A jury was waived, and the trial court found for the plaintiffs in each action. Separate judgments were entered, and the defendants have appealed from each, but the appeals were again consolidated for the purposes of briefing and argument in this Court. Trial de novo has been demanded in each appeal.

These actions stem from one fire which consumed the defendants’ body shop in which there were located three motor vehicles which were also destroyed by the fire. The plaintiffs are owners or sub-rogees of owners of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Spielman v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Farmers Home Mutual Insurance v. Grand Forks Implement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Wyatt v. BaughmanUtah Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brash v. GullesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Foerster v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Soby Construction, Inc. v. Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. F-M Potatoes, Inc. v. SudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wheat v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API