Legal Opinion

Rask v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1918No. 21,660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment for $15,000, rendered, under the federal employers’ liability act, in favor of the plaintiif for damages caused by injuries sustained by him in a collision between railroad locomotives while he was employed by the defendant as an engineer on a locomotive pulling an extra freight train.

The defendant argues that the injuries of the plaintiif were caused solely by his own negligence in disobeying the company’s rule 93. That rule reads as follows:

“Rule 93. Stations having yard limits will be designated in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Roebuck v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Pyles v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. LowdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Quilantan v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API