Legal Opinion

Quilantan v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1921No. 23,150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; WILLIAM it McCamish, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued under the Federal employer’s liability act to recover for an injury caused by being struck by one of the defendants’ engines. He recovered, but the court set the verdict aside and rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals and assigns as error certain instructions given, rendering judgment for the defendants on the findings of fact, and the refusal of a new trial.

He alleged that he was a trackman in the employ of the defendants, the railroad company and the director general, working upon the railroad tracks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Roebuck v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Land v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Rockhold v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. LowdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Griffith v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Jameson v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API