Legal Opinion

Buchtel v. Mason

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error- to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit against the defendants in the Muskegon circuit, to recover the amount due upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“$1,500. Muskegon, Mich., July 1, 1880.
“ Twenty-six months after date we promise to pay to the order of William Buchtel fifteen hundred dollars, at the Bank of Akron, Ohio, value received, with interest.
“ L. G. Mason.
“C. S. Davis.”

*606The declaration was upon the common counts. Plea, general issue.

On the twenty-first day of March last, the cause was tried, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for the sum of $2,278.50, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Hoyle v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lowe v. SchuylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API