People v. Thornburg
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges
Defendant-appellant, Thornburg, brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress eyewitness identification evidence. The trial court denied the motion to suppress after an evidentiary hearing on the circumstances surrounding the identification. We dismiss the appeal, since it does not come within the ambit of the interlocutory appeal rule.
C.A.R. 4.1 (a) states:
“Either the state or the defendant may file an interlocutory appeal in the appellate court from an adverse ruling of any trial court as to a motion made in advance of trial for return of property…
2Cited by17 opinions
- People v. FidlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- People v. BraunthalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. HenrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- People v. LindseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.