Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Brothers Line

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1967No. 23746_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

Now in its sixth decade the Shipping Act of 1916 affords the basis for the first and only suit for severe civil penalties brought by the Government for failure of a water carrier in foreign commerce to file appropriate tariffs. A second count asserted like penalties under the Intercoastal Shipping Act, a later 1933 enactment. The Government lost both counts, the foreign commerce claim at the close of the Government’s evidence, the second at the conclusion of the carrier’s case. The big issue 1 as to each was whether the carrier’s activity was that of a common…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lone Star Motor Import, Inc. v. Citroen Cars CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bobby Jones Garden Apartments, Inc. v. F. R. SuleskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Banco Continental v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Cottonwood Mall Shopping Center, Inc. v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Capitol Transportation, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Maritime Commission, Sea-Land Service, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API