Legal Opinion
In re Bally Manufacturing Securities Corp. Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 4, 1992No. Nos. 90 C 6057, 90 C 6235, 90 C 6265, 90 C 6592 and 91 C 2540PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs David Arazie, Gary Hurlick, Paul Karinsky, William and Ann Klein, Aldo Mirizzi, Lawrence and Florence Moss, Kevin O’Sullivan, Jeffrey Starr, and Arthur Yorkes bring this action against defendants Robert E. Mullane, Roger Keesee, Paul J. Johnson, Patrick L. O’Malley, William E. Chandler, and Bally Manufacturing Co. (collectively, “Bally” or “company”).1 They allege that Bally misrepresented and fraudulently concealed the true financial health of the company in violation of state *264and federal law. We have before us plaintiffs’ motion…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- David Arazie, Paul Karinsky, William Klein v. Robert E. Mullane, Paul J. Johnson, William E. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Elliott v. ITT Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In re Prudential Securities Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Fugman v. Aprogenex, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.