Legal Opinion

Zach v. Bak

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided September 12, 1952No. 2406Published

1Opinion of the Court

Flood, J.,

Plaintiff’s bill seeks specific performance of an oral promise to give a mortgage on defendants’ home as security for loans made by plaintiff in the amount of $2,000. Defendants filed preliminary objections interposing the statute of frauds as to realty: Act of March 21, 1772, 1 Sm. L. 389, 33 PS §1.

Thus is raised a question which has never been directly decided in any reported case in Pennsylvania: whether the statute of frauds prevents specific performance of an oral promise to give a mortgage as security for a loan. Such a promise is one instance in the class of cases categorized…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Watson v. HobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Douglass v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API