Zach v. Bak
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Flood, J.,
Plaintiff’s bill seeks specific performance of an oral promise to give a mortgage on defendants’ home as security for loans made by plaintiff in the amount of $2,000. Defendants filed preliminary objections interposing the statute of frauds as to realty: Act of March 21, 1772, 1 Sm. L. 389, 33 PS §1.
Thus is raised a question which has never been directly decided in any reported case in Pennsylvania: whether the statute of frauds prevents specific performance of an oral promise to give a mortgage as security for a loan. Such a promise is one instance in the class of cases categorized…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Watson v. HobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Douglass v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.