Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sotelo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1994No. 2-93-167-CR, 2-93-252-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILL, Chief Justice.

Joe Angelo Sotelo, Jr. appeals from the denial of his writ of habeas corpus in which he challenged the requirement of submitting himself to urinalysis twice weekly, at his expense, as a condition of his bail bond on appeal. Additionally, he appeals from the order of the trial court making more specific the requirement that he submit himself to urinalysis twice weekly, at his own expense, as a condition of his bond. He contends in two points of error in both causes that this bond condition unnecessarily infringes upon his right to privacy and subjects him to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Michael Stevens Owens v. Asa D. Kelley, Jr., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  5. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AndererCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Cuellar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. in Re Judith Shoemaker Gibson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
  5. State v. StanfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API