State v. Stanford
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Justice.
Defendant-appellant Kelly A. Stanford appeals: (1) her conviction of prostitution, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1200 (Supp.1992)1; and (2) the bail condition requiring her to stay out of the WaikM area between the hours of six o’clock in the evening and six o’clock in the morning. On appeal, Stanford contends that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction and that the court’s geographically restrictive bail order is unconstitutional because it is overbroad, vague, and ambiguous. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In the early morning hours of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. PoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JING HUA XIAOHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JING HUA XIAOHawaii Supreme Court · 2010