Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Bushnell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2014No. DA 12-0711PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat

¶1 Daniel Bushnell (Dan) appeals the District Court’s order requiring him to designate his former spouse, Rachel Bushnell (Rachel), as the beneficiary of his Survivorship Annuity in his Survivor Benefit Plan. The following issue is presented for review:

¶2 Did the District Court err by requiring Dan to name Rachel as the beneficiary of his Survivor Annuity under Dan’s Survivorship Benefit Plan?

¶3 We reverse.

BACKGROUND

¶4 Dan and Rachel were married in October of 2000. Dan filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage on June 25, 2009. The parties entered into a Parenting Plan and a Dissolution…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ophus v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cole v. Valley Ice Garden, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Briese v. Montana Public Employees' Retirement BoardMontana Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Cadena v. FriesMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Marriage of WagenmanMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API