Legal Opinion
Metro Wastewater Reclamation District v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 23, 1992No. Civ. A. Nos. 89-C-895, 90-2-880PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1
PRINGLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In case No. 89-C-895, Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (hereinafter “Metro”) *474seeks 1) a declaratory judgment that certain insurance carriers have an obligation to defend proceedings initiated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (hereinafter, “EPA”) and to pay “damages” for which Metro may be liable; 2) a decree of specific performance; and 3) reimbursement for costs and expenses already incurred. Basically, the same claims have been made by the City of Lakewood (hereinafter “Lakewood”)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Griffith v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Black v. Southwestern Water Conservation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. Hydrite Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.