Legal Opinion

Hughley v. Frazier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 27, 2002No. A01A2462, A01A2463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

Austin Hughley brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. Mary Frazier and Dr. Raymond Rubin alleging that as a result of their misdiagnosis of his medical condition, surgery was required which rendered him permanently incontinent. Both defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the two-year statute of limitation had run on Hughley’s claims. The trial court granted Dr. Rubin’s motion but denied that of Dr. Frazier, concluding that under the “continuous treatment” doctrine discussed in Williams v. Young, 247 Ga. App. 337 (543 SE2d 737) (2000),…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. ZirkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. GowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Young v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Frankel v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Walker v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kane v. ShoupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Kitchens v. BrusmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Burt v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Brown v. Coast Dental of Georgia, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Harrison v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API