In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} In the case below, the Public Utilities Commission approved a “program portfolio plan” proposed by the American Electric Power (“AEP”) operating companies. The plan, developed in consultation with a wide array of interested parties, contains a variety of programs that are designed to increase energy efficiency and reduce peak demands on AEP’s system. Such programs are required by law. R.C. 4928.66(A)(1).
{¶ 2} Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) appeals from the commission’s approval of the plan on four grounds. None of its arguments compels reversal, and we affirm.
Background
{¶ 3} Under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Application of E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Minerva Dairy, Inc. v. MinervaOhio Court of Appeals · 2025