Legal Opinion

In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2011No. 2010-1533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} In the case below, the Public Utilities Commission approved a “program portfolio plan” proposed by the American Electric Power (“AEP”) operating companies. The plan, developed in consultation with a wide array of interested parties, contains a variety of programs that are designed to increase energy efficiency and reduce peak demands on AEP’s system. Such programs are required by law. R.C. 4928.66(A)(1).

{¶ 2} Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) appeals from the commission’s approval of the plan on four grounds. None of its arguments compels reversal, and we affirm.

Background

{¶ 3} Under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Application of E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  2. In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Minerva Dairy, Inc. v. MinervaOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API