Legal Opinion

Weathers v. . Borders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was heard at Fall Term, 1897, and reported in 121 N.C. 389.

It has been held that a petition to rehear a case, which had been decided by this Court, should contain a plain, concise statement of the facts or law overlooked, or erroneously decided; but that it should not undertake to establish such alleged errors by a course of reasoning. Whitev. Jones, 92 N.C. 388.

This petition is an argument containing ten pages of printed matter with citation of authorities to sustain the argument, and was used as a brief by the petitioner in his argument. This rule may not always have been observed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Dougherty v. . SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Hughes v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoqueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Watson v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abrams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Abrams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Smith ex rel. Smith v. KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API