Dougherty v. . Sprinkle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civiij ACTION tried at January Special Term, 1882, of Meck-LEÑBURG- Superior Court, before Bennett, J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtRuffin, J.
The single question presented in this appeal is, whether the court of a justice of the peace can entertain an action against a married woman, brought upon a promise to pay for work done upon premises owned and held as her separate property.
In Fisher v. Webb, 84 N. C., 44, a doubt was expressed as to whether that court had jurisdiction of any cause arising ex con-tracta against a feme covert; but as the point did not directly arise in that case, and was not necessarily involved in its decision, it was not intended to conclude it. It was, therefore, fairly open to the plaintiff to be raised, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pippen v. . WessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Lutz v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- McAdoo v. Callum Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Murphy v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Fisher v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Flaum v. Wallace Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Neville v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Vann v. Edwards.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.