People v. McKinney
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted by a jury of delivery of heroin 1 and sentenced to 10 to 20 years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Because of an unfairly prejudicial line of inquiry pursued by the prosecutor during his cross-examination of defendant, we reverse the Court of Appeals, vacate the conviction and sentence, and remand the case for a new trial._
I
Defendant testified in his own behalf. He specifically denied ever using or selling heroin. While cross-examining him, the prosecutor inquired at great length and in detail about defendant’s knowledge of heroin, its use, and the use of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. DerMartzexMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. BeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. WilkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.