Legal Opinion

People v. McKinney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1981No. Docket 64695PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by a jury of delivery of heroin 1 and sentenced to 10 to 20 years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Because of an unfairly prejudicial line of inquiry pursued by the prosecutor during his cross-examination of defendant, we reverse the Court of Appeals, vacate the conviction and sentence, and remand the case for a new trial._

I

Defendant testified in his own behalf. He specifically denied ever using or selling heroin. While cross-examining him, the prosecutor inquired at great length and in detail about defendant’s knowledge of heroin, its use, and the use of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. DerMartzexMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. BeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. WilkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API