Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 1916Published

Original proceedings in Mandamus.

1ConcurrenceWhitfield, J.

(concurring) — -The statute confers upon the Railroad Commissioners authority to “require the erection of such freight and passenger depots, etc., with all necessary conveniences as the safety, convenience and comfort of passengers and the proper handling, care, protection and prompt delivery of and transportation of freight may require. Subdivision 5, Section 3, Chapter 6527 Acts of 1913, Sec. 2893 Compiled Laws of 1914. Authority to make an order in the premises appearing, the question to be determined is whether the order as made is enforceable by mandamus. Orders made by the Railroad…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API