Legal Opinion
Panzer v. Harding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., resulting from a dog bite, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated January 11, 1985, which is in favor of the defendants, upon a jury verdict.
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The undisputed testimony that, prior to biting the infant *843plaintiff, the defendants’ dog liked to play with and was gentle with children, had neither bitten anyone, nor had been the subject of any complaint, had played with the infant plaintiff the night before the incident in question and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olsen v. Chase Manhattan BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Olsen v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Caceres v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Dier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colarusso v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Vavosa v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Fox v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Stoop v. KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Bellocchio v. 783 Beck Street Housing Development Fund Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.