Legal Opinion

McFerran v. Sanwick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1962No. 36214PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Finley, C. J. —

The trial court ordered the complaint of plaintiff Edward M. McFerran stricken, pursuant to Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 11, RCW Yol. 0, upon finding that the complaint was sham and false. The appellant, Edward M. McFerran, is seeking review of that order and the findings contained therein.

The parties herein involved were also before this court in Sanwick v. McFerran (1961), 57 Wn. (2d) 875, 360 P. (2d) 580. In that case an agreement under which the respondent could exercise an exclusive option to purchase real estate was at issue. We affirmed the trial court’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vaktaren Publishing Co. v. Pacific Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Sanwick v. McFerranWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanwick v. Puget Sound Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API