Legal Opinion

United States v. Wright

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 30, 2007No. 06-1514, 06-1515UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.

Joel Wesley Laird and Michael D. Wright (collectively “the defendants”), federal prisoners who are represented by counsel, appeal their convictions on various drug and firearm charges. The parties have waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Because the district court abused its discretion in conducting voir dire, we VACATE Laird and Wright’s convictions.

I

Laird and Wright were both indicted and tried together on November 18, 2005. A jury convicted Laird of possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. David MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Wendell BlountCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  5. The Robert N. Clemens Trust v. Morgan Stanley Dw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Victor Everette SilversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API