Legal Opinion

Morris v. Kospelich

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 20, 1969No. 49141PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice:

The question of law herein presented is res nova and because of its importance we directed certiorari to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, for review of its judgment which held that plaintiff, Robert L. Morris, III, as a joint tortfeasor, and his insurer, Reliance Insurance Company of Philadelphia, were entitled to recover in a separate or plenary lawsuit the plaintiffs’ virile share of money expended as a result of a voluntary compromise between themselves and the injured party, Frederick Elliot, without the knowledge, consent, or concurrence of the other joint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. KospelichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Morris v. KospelichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Katherine Dunn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Brasscraft Manufacturing Company, Inc. And Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Stephenson v. McClureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ducote v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API