Legal Opinion

Horrocks v. Westfalia Systemat

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 3, 1995No. 940201-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Westfalia Systemat (Westfalia) appeals the trial court’s findings and judgment excusing the buyer-appellee, Garold Horrocks (Hor-rocks), from remitting the balance due for milking equipment which Westfalia had not delivered under a contract between the parties. Westfalia contends that because Hor-rocks signed an acknowledgment declaring that he had received all of the equipment, Horrocks and not Westfalia should bear the responsibility for the loss of the goods after Westfalia’s agent left town with the equipment instead of making delivery. We affirm.

FACTS

Garold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Vickers v. North American Land Developments, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. County of MacOn v. ShoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Republic Group, Inc. v. Won-Door Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Information Leasing Corp. v. GDR Investments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp. v. J.W.C.J.R. Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. Zions Gate R.V. Resort, LLC v. OliphantCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. Sine Enterprises, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Wesley Sine v. Jaguar Credit Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Alpine 4 Technologies Limited v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API