Legal Opinion
In re Hammond
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 19, 2011No. 2010-B-0419PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Noland James Hammond, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension for threat of harm to the public. In re: Hammond, 05-2538 (La.12/22/05), 917 So.2d 433.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March 2008, the ODC filed twenty-four counts of formal charges against respondent. The formal charges can be grouped together into three broad categories: Counts I through XII, which involve inappropriate sexual contact…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- In Re JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Amended March 6, 2015 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Amended March 6, 2015 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015