Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1976No. M-75-665PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Appellant Joel H. Johnson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in a Municipal Court of Record of the City of Tulsa for Failure to Prevent Dog From Running At Large in violation of Title 2, § 2(b), Municipal Ordinances of the City of Tulsa. His punishment was fixed at a fine of Twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars, and from said judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

As the charge upon which the defendant was convicted was based upon a city ordinance, it is necessary that the ordinance be properly presented to this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Sproles v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Weis v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API