Allen v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BUSSEY, Judge.
The plaintiff-in-error and defendant ■herein, Lavina Allen, was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa, by information with the offense of operating a bawdy house in violation of City Ordinance, Title 19, Section 171. A jury trial was waived and the case was. tried to the Honorable John M. Imel, Judge. The court found the defendant guilty, a fine of $16 was assessed and thereafter this appeal was timely perfected.
The City of Tulsa did not file a brief although the appellant filed an exhaustive brief. Where a person charged is convicted and thereafter…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Tulsa v. EliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hishaw v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Goomda v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Sawyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Wormuth v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.