Legal Opinion

Allen v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1961No. A-13022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUSSEY, Judge.

The plaintiff-in-error and defendant ■herein, Lavina Allen, was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa, by information with the offense of operating a bawdy house in violation of City Ordinance, Title 19, Section 171. A jury trial was waived and the case was. tried to the Honorable John M. Imel, Judge. The court found the defendant guilty, a fine of $16 was assessed and thereafter this appeal was timely perfected.

The City of Tulsa did not file a brief although the appellant filed an exhaustive brief. Where a person charged is convicted and thereafter…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. City of Tulsa v. EliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hishaw v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Goomda v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Sawyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Wormuth v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API