Legal Opinion
Kenneth Tiedemann v. Barbara Von Blanckensee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2023No. 21-15073PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KENNETH DANIEL TIEDEMANN, No. 21-15073 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17- v. cv-00597-CKJ BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE; GENE BEASLEY; SCOTT YOUNG, OPINION Defendants-Appellees, and MARY M. MITCHELL, Regional Director; J. T. SHARTLE, Warden; RAFAEL ZUNIGA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 12, 2023 San Francisco, California Filed July 3, 2023 2 TIEDEMANN V. VON BLANCKENSEE Before: Sidney R. Thomas and Holly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- William Webb, Jr. v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- (PC) Allen v. ClendeninDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Grissom v. KeenanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Jones v. BeneviousDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Williams v. AliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.