Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The question in this case is whether the evidence warranted a finding that the plaintiff received an injury through the negligence of the defendant or its servants. At the close of the evidence the defendant presented a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied. Thereafter the trial judge reserved leave to enter a verdict under G. L. c. 231, § 120. The jury found for the plaintiff, whereupon the judge upon motion of the defendant ordered a verdict to be entered for the defendant; the plaintiff excepted.

The testimony tended to show the following facts: The defendant's premises were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Griffin v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Navien v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Melvin v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Kendall v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API