Kelley v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The question in this case is whether the evidence warranted a finding that the plaintiff received an injury through the negligence of the defendant or its servants. At the close of the evidence the defendant presented a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied. Thereafter the trial judge reserved leave to enter a verdict under G. L. c. 231, § 120. The jury found for the plaintiff, whereupon the judge upon motion of the defendant ordered a verdict to be entered for the defendant; the plaintiff excepted.
The testimony tended to show the following facts: The defendant's premises were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Griffin v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Navien v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Melvin v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Kendall v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelly v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932