Legal Opinion

Hill v. Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, William R. Hill, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of November, 1896, denying his motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

The plaintiff is the lessee and in the possession of the premises known as No. 103 West Thirty-sixth street, under a lease which *300expires on the 1st of May, 1897. He carries on at that place the business of plumbing and other business, and has done so for several years. The defendant Schneider is the owner in fee of the premises. He also owns the land on Thirty-sixth street, between-Broadway and Sixth avenue, extending northerly about 100 feet. He is engaged in- work preliminary to the construction of a large hotel building on these premises, and, to that end, has entered into a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. City of Joliet v. HarwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Livingston v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  5. Morgan v. BowesNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. VandenheukSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Horn v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Barrett v. Federal Crushed Stone Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ryback v. Godwin Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Stevenson v. PucciNew York Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API