Sherman v. Finch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This action was brought for the alleged conversion of certain personal property. Upon a part of the property plaintiffs held a chattel mortgage, and for the other part a bill of sale from one Gibson, who *69was the original owner. Gibson was in debt to one Schoonover, upon which indebtedness he was sued, a judgment given against him, and on which judgment an execution was issued and placed in the hands of the defendant officer. The officer levied upon and sold all of the said property, under and by virtue of the execution, as and for the property of Gibson, and sought to justify his proceedings…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wood v. FranksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hopkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Irwin v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Second National Bank v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Deaux v. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.