Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 26, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

The appellant was charged with having committed robbery while he was armed with a dangerous weapon and while he entertained the intent to kill or maim his victim if resistance was offered. The crime denominated “robbery by- person armed” is defined in Section 813.01, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A. The jury found the defendant “guilty of armed robbery as charged”; then added, “But with no intention to kill or maim.”

The trial judge when passing sentence adjudged the defendant guilty of “armed robbery without intent, to kill.” At this juncture the matter came to us on habeas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blanco v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Ex Parte: Harvey WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API