Legal Opinion

Ex Parte: Harvey Wilson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 30, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

Habeas corpus was employed to present a challenge to the validity of the verdict, and the judgment upon which the petitioner was imprisoned.

The information charged him with the commission of robbery by a person armed, defined in Sec. 7157 C.G.L. 1927 (now Sec. 13.01, Florida Statute, 1941). An element of the offense necessary to be proven to justify conviction is the intent of the perpetrator, at the time of the assault, to kill or maim his victim “if resisted.”

The jury found the defendant “guilty of armed robbery as charged. But with no intention to Mil or maim.” (Italics…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allison v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. Vena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. McClanahan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API