Legal Opinion
Ryall v. Appleton Electric Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 10, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-K-510PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before me on Defendant Appleton Electric Company’s objections to the magistrate judge’s January 31, 1991 memorandum opinion and order granting Plaintiff Juliann K. Ryall’s motion to compel. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion of this order which is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. I sustain Appleton’s objections in part and set aside the order granting Ryall’s motion to compel.
Ryall brings this action under federal and state civil rights laws,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Darius v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Aull v. Cavalcade Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Walker v. County of Contra CostaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Peterson v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Fernandez v. Tequilas Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.