Legal Opinion

In re Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 2000No. 25222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to disbarment from the practice of law in this state. We *318accept the agreement and disbar respondent.1 The facts as admitted in the agreement are as follows.

Facts

Respondent was holding $150,000 in criminal forfeiture funds in an escrow account for payment to the United States Government. Respondent purchased shares of stock “on the margin” for his personal use.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. In Re IsemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. In re JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API