In Re Iseman

Marvin Daniel Iseman (“Respondent”) has taken exception to the Subpanel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct’s (“Subpanel”) recommendation that he be disbarred and required to pay the costs of these proceedings.

factual/Procedural Background

This attorney discipline matter arises from Respondent’s conduct involving two separate events: (1) a series of money leasing transactions and (2) bank fraud.

A. “Money Leasing” Transaction

Evidently deft at putting together convoluted international business transactions that circumvent tax laws and involve large amounts of risk, Respondent was hired by a…