Diaz v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction in Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Diaz, 507 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer the following three certified questions of great public importance:
I.Should the legislative amendment of Section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1983), abolishing the statute of repose in product liability actions, be construed to operate retrospectively as to a cause of action which accured before the effective date of the amendment?
II.If not, should the decision of Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1114, 106 S.Ct. 1626, 90…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Melendez v. Dreis and Krump Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. DiazDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Metropolitan Dade County v. American Bankers Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Decamp v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Pozo v. PradaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990